|
CHAPTER IX
THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE ABSOLUTE SELF
I shall, therefore, disregard the subtle difference
made in later Vedantic treatises between avidya and maya
in relation to the Jiva and the Isvara, merely for purposes
of facility of exposition, and take the words maya, avidya
and ajnana as synonymous, and shortly and scientifically deal
with the question as to what is ordinarily the elementary form
of this Maya with its three constituents or of avidya, ajnana,
or molia, and also how the doctrines of the Gita or of the
Upanisads can be explained with reference to that form.
Although the words nirguna and saguva are apparently
insignificant, yet, when one considers all the various things
which they include, the entire Cosmos verily stands in front of
one's eyes. These two small words embrace such numerous
and ponderous questions as : how has the unbroken entity of
that enternal Parabrahman, which is the Root of the Cosmos,
been broken up by its acquiring the numerous activities or
qualities which are perceptible to human organs, though it
was originally ONE, inactive, and apathetic ?; or, how is that,
which was fundamentally homogeneous, now seen to be trans-
formed into distinct, heterogeneous, and perceptible objects?;
how has that Parabrahman, which is nirvikara (immutable),
and which does not possess the various qualities of sweetness,
pungency, bitterness, solidity, liquidity, heat or cold, given
rise to different kinds of tastes, or to more or less of solidity
or liquidity, or to numerous couples of opposite qualities, such
as, heat and cold, happiness and pain, light and darkness, death
and immortality ?; how has that Parabrahman, which is
peaceful and undisturbed, given rise to numerous kinds of voices
or sounds ?; how has that Parabrahman, which does not know
the difference of inside or outside, or distant or near, acquired
the qualities of being here or further away, near or distant,
or towards the East or towards the West, which are qualities
of directions or of place 1 ; how has that Parabrahman, which
is immutable, unaffected by Time, permanent and immortal
been changed into objects, which perish in a longer or shorter
space of time ? ; or how has that Parabrahman, which is not
affected by the law of causes and products, come before us in
the form of a cause and a product, in the shape of earth and
the earthenware pot ? Or, to expreBB the same thing in short, we
"have now to consider how that which was ONE, acquired
diversity; how that which was non-dual, acquired duality;
how that which was untouched by opposite doubles (dvamdva),
"became affected by these opposite doubles; or,, how that which
was unattached (asamga), acquired attachment (samga).
Samkhya philosophy has got over this difficulty by imagining
a duality from the very beginning, and by saying that
qualityful Prakrti with its three constituents, is eternal and
independent, in the same way as the qualityless and eternal
Purusa (Spirit). But, not only is the natural tendency of the
human mind, to find out the fundamental Root of the world,
not satisfied by this duality, but it also does not bear the test
of logic.
|
|