|
CHAPTER VI
THE INTUITIONIST SCHOOL AND THE CONSIDERATION OF THE BODY AND THE ATMAN
(ADHIDAIVATA-PAKSA AND KSETRA-KSETRAJNA-VICARA)
They say that deciding whether a thing is good or bad (sat or asat), just or unjust, righteous or
unrighteous, is quite different from deciding whether a particular
object is heavy or light, white or black, or whether a calculation is correct or incorrect.
The Mind can, by logical methods, decide matters which fall within the second category;
but the Mind itself is incapable of deciding on the matters
mentioned in the first category, and that is a thing which can be
done only by the Mental Deity in the shape of the Power of
discrimination between good and bad. They explain this by
saying that in determining whether a particular calculation
is correct or incorrect, we first examine the additions or multi-
plications involved in it, and then arrive at a decision, that is
to say, before determining this question, the Mind has to go
through some other actions or activities ; but the same is not the
case in the matter of the discrimination between good and bad.
As -soon as we hear that somebody has murdered somebody
else, we immediately utter the words: "What a bad thing
has been done by him I ", and we have not to think about the
matter at all. As the decision whioh we arrive at without
any consideration, and the one which we arrive at after con-
sideration, cannot both be said to be the functions of one
and the same mental capacity, we must say that Conscience is an independent Mental Deity.
As this power or deity is equally awake in the hearts of all human beings, every
one looks upon murder as a crime, and nobody has to
Ibe taught anything about the matter.' This Intuitionist
argument is answered by Materialistic philosophers by
saying, that from the fact that we can spontaneously
arrive at a decision on any matter, we cannot draw the
conclusion that such matter must be different from
another matter as to which we come to a decision after proper
consideration. Doing a thing quickly or slowly is a matter
of practice. Take the case of calculations. Merchants quote
the rate for the seer immediately on being given the rate for
the khandy, by mental calculation. But on that account,
their deity of calculation does not become different from the
same deity of the best mathematicians. By habit, something
becomes so much part and parcel of oneself, that one does it easily and without the slightest consideration.
|
|