Gita Rahasya -Tilak 238

Gita Rahasya -Tilak

Prev.png
CHAPTER IX
THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE ABSOLUTE SELF


Out of these,, although the Atman cannot be grasped by the Mind or by Reason, that is to say, although it is beyond the reach of the organs, yet, taking as correct one's self -experience, we come to the conclusion that the Atman is not Gross, but is Thought- formed (cidrupi), or of the form of Consciousness (caitanya-rupi). Having in this way determined the form of the Atman, we have next to determine the form of the Brahman. That Brahman or vastu-tattva is either (1) of the same form as the Atman or (2) is different in form from the Atman; these two things alone are possible; because, there is no third thing which now remains except the Brahman and the Atman. But, it is our experience that if any two objects are different in form, then their effects and products must also be different. Therefore, in any science, we determine whether two things are the same or different, by considering their effects. For instance, if the roots, rootlings, bark, leaves, flowers, fruits etc. of two trees are the same, we come to the conclusion that they are the same ; and if they are different, we say that the trees are different. When the same argument is applied in the present case, we see that the Atman and the Brahman must be uniform ; because, as has been mentioned above, the synthesis of the impressions created on the Mind by the various objects in the world, which (synthesis) results from the activity of the Atman, must be the counterpart of the synthesis of all the objects in the world made by the Brahman or vastu-tattva (which is the Root of those objects) by breaking up their diversity ; if not, all Knowledge will be without foundation and will fall flat. And, it now follows as a natural conclusion that though these two Elements, which arrive at two exactly similar syntheses may be in two different places, they cannot be different from each other ; and that, the form of the Brahman must be the same as the form of the Atman.[1]

In short, from whichever point of view one considers the matter, it now follows that not only is the Brahman-Element under- lying the Names and Forms in the external world, not gross like Matter embodied in Names and Forms, but also the various forms of the Brahman, which are embodiments respectively of Desire, Mind, Knowledge, Life, Vital Force, or the logos OM-kara, are forms of a lower order, and the true form of the Brahman is beyond all of them and superior to all of them, that is to Bay, is of the form of the pure Atman. And it also follows from what has been stated in various places in the Gita on this subject, that the doctrine of the Gita is the same [2]. But, it must not be thought that this doctrine of the identity of the Brahman and the Atman was found out by our Rsis merely by some such logic ; because, as has been stated in the beginning of this chapter, no proposition can be definitely laid down in the philosophy of the Absolute Self by means of Reason alone and it must always be supported by self-experience.

Next.png

References And Context

  1. Green's Prolegomena to Ethics, §§ 26 to 36.
  2. (Gl. 2. 20 ; 7. 7 ; 8. 4 ; 13. 31 ; 15. 7, 8)

Related Articles