|
CHAPTER V
THE CONSIDERATION OF HAPPINESS AND UNHAPPINESS
(SUKHA-DUHKHA-VIVEKA)
Some persons take the objection to this position
that in as much as Action is not necessary for Release, all
Action must be given up ultimately, that is, after the
acquisition of Knowledge. But, as I am at present considering
the question only of pain and happiness, and also as I have not
yet gone into the examination of the natures of Action ( karma)
and Release ( moksa ), I shall not here answer that exception.
shall explain in detail in the ninth and tenth chapters what
Metaphysics, and the Theory of Cause and Effect are, and then
in the eleventh chapter, I will prove that even this objection is
groundless.
I have so far shown that pain and happiness are two independent and different sufferings ;
that, as it is impossible to satisfy the desire for happiness by the enjoyment of happiness,
we find that in ordinary life the sum total of unhappiness is
always greater ; that, in order to escape this unhappiness, the
most meritorious thing to do is not to totally destroy Thirst or
Discontent and at the same time Action itself, but to continue
the performance of all Actions without entertaining any hope
or the result; that, the happiness of enjoying objects of
pleasure is in itself a happiness, which is always insufficient,
inconstant, and beastly, and that the true ideal of man, who is
endowed with Reason, must be higher than such happiness;
"that, this true ideal is the happiness of the peace (santi)
which results from . Self-Realisation ; but that, although
Metaphysical Happiness is, in this way, superior to Material
Happiness, yet, one must possess with it also a proper quantity
of worldly objects; and that therefore, we must also make
Effort, that is, perform Action, desirelessly. When these
conclusions have been firmly established by the Karma- Yoga
science, I need not further say that it is wrong to decide
questions of Morality by the consideration of the external
effects of Actions in the shape of pain and happiness on the
basis that Material Happiness is the highest ideal of man —
even looking at the question from the point of view of Happi-
ness merely. Because, looking upon a thing which can never
by itself reach the state of perfection, as the 'highest' ideal, is
misusing the word 'highest' ( parama ), and is as unreasonable
as believing that water exists, where there is only a mirage.
If one 's highest ideal is itself inconstant and incomplete, then,
what else, except something inconstant can one acquire, by
keeping that ideal before one's eyes ? This is what is meant
by the words : "dharmo nityah sukhaduhkhe to anitye ' ', i. e„
"morality is immutable; pain and happiness are mutable".
|
|