कविता भाटिया (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div class="bgmbdiv"> <h3 style="text-align:center; direction: ltr; margin-left: 1em;">Yatharth Geeta -Swami Adgadanand Ji</h3> {| width=100% cellspacing="10" style="backgroun...") |
रिंकू बघेल (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
[[Category:Yatharth Geeta -Swami Adgadanand]] [[Category:Gita]] [[Category:Sanskrit Literature]] | [[Category:Yatharth Geeta -Swami Adgadanand]] [[Category:Gita]] [[Category:Sanskrit Literature]] | ||
__INDEX__ | __INDEX__ | ||
+ | [[hi:यथार्थ गीता -अड़गड़ानन्द पृ. 826]] |
Latest revision as of 15:50, 6 January 2018
Yatharth Geeta -Swami Adgadanand Ji
CHAPTER 18
The Yog of Renunciation
At the beginning of the eighteenth, the concluding chapter of the Geeta, Arjun wishes to be enlightened on the similarity as well as the distinction between relinquishment and renunciation. In response to this Krishn cites four prevalent creeds. While many savants style the abandonment of all action as renunciation, several others employ the term to designate the giving up of desired action. Many scholars advocate the forsaking of all deeds since all of them are flawed, but others are convinced that deeds such as yagya, penance, and charity ought not to be relinquished. One of these beliefs was right, too, and Krishn has pronounced a similar judgement, which is that yagya, penance, and charity must never be forsaken, for they bring deliverance to men of discernment. So fostering them while also giving up unrighteous impulses that are inimical to them is true renunciation. Such renunciation is perfect. But relinquishment with a desire for some profit in exchange is tainted by passion and moral blindness; and it is definitely evil when the prescribed deed is forsaken out of self deception. |
References and Context